NENYA PRODUCTS & SERVICES
Choose what your team needs next.
Horizon and E-Coach work independently. Add specialist support when you need it.
Nenya Horizon
Bring engineering evidence into one review.
See project health, KPI history and repository details across supported engineering sources. Find what your team needs to investigate.
8 vulnerabilities. All eight are in Portal Web; the target is no more than one.

Customer Portal · original product view with demo data. Open the image for detail.
Start with Horizon for quality and delivery reviews. Add E-Coach to work through a decision with that context.
Nenya E-Coach
Work through the decision. Keep the plan in view.
Use an AI sparring partner to clarify the goal and consider options. Keep goals, actions, due dates and progress together as the work continues.
Two recorded actions: identify 2–3 pain points across teams, then prepare the initiative proposal.

Original action items from the same DevEx demo. Open the image for detail.
Start with your own question; Horizon is optional. Team knowledge use cases are configured separately.
HORIZON + E-COACH
The release is due. What should give?
ILLUSTRATIVE RELEASE SCENARIO
A promised feature, quality concerns and limited capacity compete. Keep the plan, reduce scope or move the date? The useful outcome is a choice your team can explain and revisit.
01 / HORIZON
See the evidence
Investigate the relevant quality and delivery signals.
02 / YOUR TEAM
Add the business context
Add customer commitments, capacity and other constraints.
03 / E-COACH
Weigh the trade-offs
Explore the goal, assumptions and options. Your team chooses the next step.
What the product carries into the conversation
In this separate demo, the project, current KPI value and target carry from Horizon into E-Coach. Your team supplies the business constraints.

Active Defects: current 100 · target ≤6. Demo data; the target is not an achieved result.
ILLUSTRATIVE TEAM WORKING NOTE
Reduce scope. Keep the date conditional.
A possible team conclusion from the release scenario. This note illustrates the team’s working output; it is not an automatic product output.
Check before committing
Are the deferred features non-critical to the contract? Does the smaller scope free enough capacity for prioritised quality work?
Accepted trade-off
Some customer value arrives later. Remaining release risk still needs an explicit readiness review.
Owner: release lead · Review: next readiness review, or earlier if assumptions change.
A FOCUSED PILOT
Test the value on a decision that matters.
One use case. 5–10 users. Four weeks after setup. Finish with documented examples, a scorecard against agreed criteria and a recommendation to expand, adapt or close. Scope and commercial terms are agreed before the pilot starts.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Expertise for the work ahead.
More from Nenya
Explore Gate and Forge & Testing for further testing capabilities.
